6.
Selection for Digitisation in Research Archives
Research Archives are repositories of recorded sound materials that
have been produced, collected and preserved as acoustical sources for a
number of scholarly disciplines, e.g. anthropology and folklore;
(ethno-)musicology, linguistics; social sciences, zoology, etc. At the
core of such collections are original, unique recordings, made by scholars
to serve the specific interests of their disciplines. Generally, such
recordings are accompanied by documentation about their origin and their
contents. In addition to these unique materials, research archives may
also hold published recordings or original recordings of sister
institutions for reference purposes. Special interest collections, e.g.
Jazz or Popular Music Collections, also are part of the Research Archives
group. They may consist of a mix of original recordings made by the
respective collection, of original recordings of sister institutions, and
of commercial recordings.
Research Archives constitute the oldest and most widespread type of
sound archives. Having started in 1899, their numbers grew in the 1950s,
when magnetic recording became affordable and battery-powered tape
recorders made it possible to easily produce field recordings everywhere
in the world. The interest of the researchers generating such collections
went well beyond the limits of their respective nations. In the course of
the last fifty years research archives, specifically of wealthy countries,
accumulated considerable stocks of sound recordings from manifold cultures
from all over the world. Due to the global progress of western
civilisation, they cover a considerable time span over a period of
significant cultural change. Research Collections meanwhile constitute an
important part of the audiovisually recorded cultural heritage, adding an
important dimension of general cultural interest to the scholarly
objective they originally produced and collected for. Thus, research
archives have become by far the most significant repositories of
acoustical sources related to the cultural and linguistic diversity of
mankind.
In setting priorities for the digitisation of such collections, unique
source materials should be in the first rank. Regarding criteria inherent
to the contents of the collections, the principles as discussed under
National Archives (Ref. Chapter 5.3.1) apply. It must be noted that the
immediate research interest of the individual archive may be in conflict
with the general cultural importance of a given collection. Research
Archives must understand, however, that they have a moral obligation
regarding the safeguarding of their holdings representing early and
important historical testimonies of societies from all around the world;
even if their immediate scholarly value may be less significant
Not all of these collections, however, are archives in the narrower
sense, with an established specific preservation policy. Collections have
have often simply been regarded as tools to advance the respective
academic disciplines, with preservation issues accorded no priority in the
policy of their parent institutions, and no specific budgets allocated to
safeguard these holdings. Such policy worked more or less successfully
until recently, because in general analogue tape stocks have been fairly
stable, and tape players have continued to be available. This will change
in the near future: Carriers will increasingly become unstable and
irretrievable, and traditional tape replay equipment is about to become
obsolete. Unless research archives, specifically the small and specialised
collections attached to research institutions, establish a consistent
preservation i.e. digitisation policy, there will be a significant loss of
invaluable heritage materials. A large corpus of documents of cultural
manifestations, mainly of orally transmitted cultures of all parts of the
world will be lost in the medium term.
In view of this threat it is important that responsibility is taken to
systematically ensure the further preservation and availability of these
important materials. In the first instance this challenge should be
adequately met by the respective institutions that have produced and kept
these materials so far. This can either be done autonomously or by
appropriate co-operation between several of such collections.
Where the research collection is for one reason or another unable to
meet this preservation responsibility the respective National Archives
should take care of these materials, as being part of the respective
national production, irrespective of the contents and the cultural and
geographical origin of such recordings. |